It's been a long time and my memory is fuzzy at best. But I thought KevinB chimed in on that discussion. Maybe not?
Printable View
Yeah I honestly don't recall. He could have, and perhaps his lack of confirmation or denial of the idea led us to speculate that we were on the right track, but then again maybe not. It was a couple years ago so my recollection of that discussion is about as clear as yours. But I do recall stating with a certain level of confidence, based on discussions I had with guys familiar with fusing metals, that it must have been partially Inconel due to the unusual appearance of the naked MAMS. And since that was neither contested nor supported by any KAC rep, I think we just kind of ran with that notion. Holy shit my eyes are getting bad.
Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk
*delete*
I couldn't say what they are made of with any certainty, but a few of my MAMS have bulged to the point that I'm not comfortable attaching a can (if I could?) after using them on some belt fed MG's. The Triple Tap does seam to go longer in use without bulging, but the MAMS does seem to help control the platform better than the Triple Tap.
I'm really curious to see an all inconel version, or in that a can that handles a belt gun as well as the NT-4. I'm hesitant to to hang some of the newer KAC cans and others on some hosts. The NT-4 is like a tank, seems to out live some other brands MG only cans similar in size.
SR-25 ACC with MLOK URX4 have started to ship. I have one on the way!
Guys -- I cannot find the price of the KAC Anti-Cant Device (30855). Anyone knows MSRP?