The gun shop I got it from listed it as a new gun. Seems almost too good to be true. I can’t wait till tomorrow so I can pick it up and verify that it is what they say it is.
But yes , that would still be a decent price for a used gun.
Printable View
I've got an AR6450 and an AR6951 and both are a lot of fun to shoot. Compare the C-Products and Metalform mags... the Metalform is really heavy duty and mine have performed flawlessly.
Here's a write up on the Colt Submachine Gun, 9mm NATO, if anybody's interested. This is the predecessor of the 6951https://www.smallarmsreview.com/disp...darticles=3431
Chuck Taylor's assessment (he carried one):
http://www.chucktayloramericansmalla.../coltm635.html
.223Pound is right. I've examined the ASC mags and they look OK, but I went ahead and paid a few bucks more for Metalform 32s. They are the same as Colt OEM. I didn't get any 20s as I didn't see the need.
Finally picked mine up. I got a few metal form mags and I got a loader on the way. Looking forward to putting some rounds down range this weekend.
Well it looks like a new gun. I was skeptical at that price, but it was nice and greasy and the mag/manual/lock bag was unopened. I rarely luck into a deal like that.
It could be a counterfeit Colt though. There are no chatter marks or rough spots and the trigger isn’t total shit.
I can’t wait till my mag loader gets here. The mags are hard As hell to load.
Fired mine this week. At 25 yards, Q4318 NATO was accurate. Almost as accurate was Winchester 115 grain. 147 grain looked like buckshot patterns.